<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<html>
    <head>
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1250">
            <title>New Page 1</title>
            <style>
                <!--
p.MsoPlainText
	{margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";
	margin-left:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-top:0in}
-->
            </style>
        </head>
        <body>
            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                <span lang="EN-US">
                    <b>ARTICLE ALERT</b>
                </span>
            </p>
            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                <span lang="EN-US">October 12, 2007</span>
            </p>
            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
            </p>
            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                <span lang="EN-US">Alsultany, Evelyn<br>
<font color="#3333CC"><b>SELLING AMERICAN DIVERSITY AND MUSLIM AMERICAN IDENTITY 
THROUGH NONPROFIT ADVERTISING POST-9/11</b></font>&nbsp; (American Quarterly, vol. 
59, no. 3, September 2007, pp. 593-622) </span></p>
                <p class="MsoPlainText">
                    <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                </p>
                <p class="MsoPlainText">
                    <span lang="EN-US">The author, an assistant professor in 
the Program in American Culture, University of Michigan, explores how nonprofit 
advertising participated in refiguring an imagined American community in 
relation to Islam after 9/11 when patriotic advertising campaigns flooded 
highway billboards, radios, magazines, newspapers, and television.&nbsp; Examining 
how Muslim identities were packaged, marketed, and sold through nonprofit 
advertising, the author compares three campaigns: the Ad Councils I am an 
American, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) I am an American 
Muslim, and the U.S. Department of States Shared Values Initiative.&nbsp; It 
demonstrates how a nonprofit organization, a civil rights group, and the U.S. 
government sought to deconstruct the binary opposition between American citizen 
and Arab Muslim terrorist that emerged after 9/11 and produced a diverse 
imagined American community.&nbsp; The least effective one, according to the author, 
was that of the U.S. government as part of its expensive public diplomacy 
campaign. The Ad Councils PSA was presumably successful effective while the 
CAIR ad was hard to evaluate as it was not widely circulated.&nbsp; [PUBS;MJM]</span>
                </p>
                <p class="MsoPlainText">
                    <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                </p>
                <p class="MsoPlainText">
                    <span lang="EN-US">Delbanco, Andrew&nbsp;<br>
<font color="#3333CC"><b>ACADEMIC BUSINESS</b></font>&nbsp; (New York Times Magazine, 
September 30, 2007, pp. 25//30)</span></p>
                    <p class="MsoPlainText">
                        <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>
                    </p>
                    <p class="MsoPlainText">
                        <span lang="EN-US">The author, director of American 
studies at Columbia University, questions whether the modern university has 
become just another corporation.&nbsp; To maintain their tax-exempt status, hospitals 
are required to care for indigent patients and charitable foundations are 
required to give away a hefty percentage of their money but what exactly are 
colleges doing to justify their public subsidies? Private colleges and 
universities pay no taxes on tuition revenues or on income from their 
endowments, of which Harvard boasts the largest ($35 billion). Driven by big 
science and global competition, top universities now compete for market share 
and brand-name positioning, employ teams of consultants and lobbyists, furnish 
their campuses with luxuries to attract paying customers and earn royalties 
from technologies developed with the help of government grants, thanks to the 
1980 Bayh-Dole Act which permitted patents on discoveries made with public 
funds.&nbsp; [PUBS;MJM]</span>
                    </p>
                    <p class="MsoPlainText">
                        <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                    </p>
                    <p class="MsoPlainText">
                        <span lang="EN-US">McCammack, Brian&nbsp;<br>
<font color="#3333CC"><b>HOT DAMNED AMERICA: EVANGELICALISM AND THE CLIMATE 
CHANGE POLICY DEBATE</b></font>&nbsp; (American Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 3, September 
2007, pp. 645-668) </span></p>
                        <p class="MsoPlainText">
                            <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                        </p>
                        <p class="MsoPlainText">
                            <span lang="EN-US">The author, a doctoral student at 
Harvard University, argues that climate change is shaping up to be the defining 
environmental issue of the twenty-first century, as an unlikely group, 
evangelical Christians that have broken rank with the faiths politically 
conservative leadership, now represent one of the U.S. greatest hopes for 
instituting meaningful legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.&nbsp; 
Potentially commanding an audience of more than 100 million, these evangelical 
environmentalists advocate immediate legislative action inspired by a biblical 
foundation in principles of environmental stewardship and a commitment to caring 
for the worlds poor, who will bear the brunt of climate changes environmental 
impacts.&nbsp; For a faith that has found political coherence and influence in the 
past quarter-century on personal moral issues such as abortion and gay marriage, 
the result is a potential wedge within evangelicalism surrounding rhetorical, 
theological, and ideological battles over biblically-based responsibilities to 
the environment and to mankind.&nbsp; Ultimately, evangelicals may prove to be just 
as important for climate change, with their ability to mobilize millions of 
Americans on the issue, as climate change proves to be for evangelicals a 
re-examination of political and theological priorities. [PUBS;MJM]</span>
                        </p>
                        <p class="MsoPlainText">
                            <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                        </p>
                        <p class="MsoPlainText">
                            <span lang="EN-US">Winston, Diane H.<br>
<font color="#3333CC"><b>BACK TO THE FUTURE: RELIGION, POLITICS, AND THE MEDIA</b></font>&nbsp; 
(American Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 3, September 2007, pp. 969-989)</span></p>
                            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                                <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                            </p>
                            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                                <span lang="EN-US">The author, who holds the Knight 
Chair in Media and Religion at the Annenberg School for Communication, 
University of Southern California, believes that since 2000, many American 
journalists have had a come to Jesus experience.&nbsp; Spurred by the rise of 
increasingly politicized religion and religious politics, they have rediscovered 
the role of religion in public life.&nbsp; But is this current fascination only the 
latest two-step in a longstanding dance?&nbsp; When New Englands earliest colonists 
began circulating news of important events, they framed their stories with a 
religious perspective: divine providence played a decisive role in covering and 
interpreting everyday occurrences.&nbsp; Since then, religion has continued to play 
an important role in the both the news media and in the news narratives that 
helped shape Americans self-understanding.&nbsp; The author examines the religious 
tropes of the beloved community (left) and the promised land (right) that 
continue to dominate media coverage of American politics.&nbsp; Focusing on the 
twentieth century, she explores how the mainstream medias hostility to 
religious conservatism has changed, and why progressive religious politics are 
rarely covered.&nbsp; [PUBS;MJM]</span>
                            </p>
                            <p class="MsoPlainText">
                                <span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span>
                            </p>
                        </body>
                    </html>

